Choose GST-800 for tighter access and compact flail work
GST-800 is the better fit when orchard rows, vineyard lines, narrower passages and controlled rough-grass work still reward a more compact tracked flail mower.
This compare guide is for buyers choosing between a compact 800 mm tracked flail mower and the main 1000 mm standard-flail balance point for orchard rows, rough grass, field edges, maintained slopes and daily vegetation control.
GST-800 is the better fit when orchard rows, vineyard lines, narrower passages and controlled rough-grass work still reward a more compact tracked flail mower.
GST-1000 is the better fit when broader daily coverage, heavier routine vegetation control and the main 1000 mm standard-flail route matter more than compact width.
| Comparison point | GST-800 | GST-1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Machine role | Compact standard hybrid remote-controlled tracked flail mower | Core standard hybrid remote-controlled tracked flail mower |
| Cutting width | 800 mm | 1000 mm |
| Engine path | Gasoline 459 (16HP) / Diesel 192F (12HP) | Gasoline 459 (16HP) / Diesel 192F (12HP) |
| Battery system | 2 × 12V 20Ah batteries in series (24V system) | 2 × 12V 20Ah batteries in series (24V system) |
| Net weight | 338 kg | 346 kg |
| Control system | C7 standard / industrial remote optional | C7 standard / industrial remote optional |
| Lift system | Manual standard / hydraulic remote optional | Manual standard / hydraulic remote optional |
| Best fit | Tighter access, orchard rows and narrower rough-grass work | Broader orchard work and heavier routine vegetation control |
The engine route is not the main decision here. The real decision is whether the buyer still needs compact flail access or already wants the broader 1000 mm standard machine for heavier routine work.
The 800 mm route makes more sense where orchard rows, vineyard lines and narrow work zones still define how the machine can be used.
The 1000 mm route makes more sense once the site can accept more width and the buyer wants the main standard-flail balance point.
Still strong for rough grass and compact flail work, but naturally lighter on pass width and daily coverage.
Better when the operator wants a stronger standard-flail routine with fewer passes and broader daily area coverage.
Keeps the same gasoline and diesel route while preserving a more compact flail footprint.
Keeps the same gasoline and diesel route but turns it into the more central 1000 mm machine for broader commercial use.
Best when stepping up from mower limits into flail cutting without immediately choosing the larger core machine.
Best when the buyer already knows the compact route is no longer enough and wants the main standard-family decision point.
After the comparison, the buyer should be able to move into the family page, the right product page, dealer communication or support clarification without losing the selection context.
Because the main difference is not the engine route. It is the machine role: compact 800 mm access versus the broader 1000 mm standard-flail balance point for daily work.
Stay with GST-800 when tighter access, narrower work zones and a more compact tracked flail mower still matter more than the extra width of GST-1000.
Move to GST-1000 when broader daily coverage, heavier routine vegetation control and the main standard-flail decision point matter more than compact width.
Yes. Like the best professional compare pages, it should end with the right next action rather than leave the buyer with only a parameter table.